In the era of modern agriculture where food safety and consumer health are top priorities, the use of plant protection products (PPPs) must strictly comply with pre-harvest intervals (PHI) and maximum residue limits (MRL). So for Propiconazole—a widely used fungicide—what is the appropriate PHI? Does it leave harmful residues?

Let’s explore the detailed answers below.

Rice blast and grain discoloration (often linked to kernel smut or fungal/biotic infection) are two of the most dangerous diseases in rice cultivation, causing significant losses in both yield and grain quality. Among the current control solutions, Propiconazole is highly recommended by experts for its strong efficacy and broad-spectrum activity.

But how effective are Propiconazole-based fungicides in managing these diseases? And what should farmers be aware of when using them? Let’s dive into the details below.

Propiconazole is a triazole fungicide, well-known for its strong systemic activity, upward translocation, and broad-spectrum efficacy. While it is widely used in rice and vegetables, Propiconazole also proves effective on industrial crops such as black pepper, coffee, and rubber.

This article analyzes how Propiconazole works on each of these crops—from target diseases and usage to key technical notes.

Among the many active ingredients used in fungal disease management today, Propiconazole is consistently one of the most commonly applied across various crops. But what makes it so highly favored, and why does it appear in so many broad-spectrum fungicide formulations?

Let’s explore the scientific and practical reasons behind the popularity of Propiconazole.

Propiconazole is one of the most widely used active ingredients in fungicides today, especially effective against diseases such as rice blast, rust, powdery mildew, leaf spots, anthracnose, and more. However, not everyone understands how Propiconazole works, why it is so effective, and why it's widely used in many crop protection products.

Let’s dive into the detailed mechanism of action of Propiconazole in the article below.

In managing fungal diseases in crops, farmers frequently encounter active ingredients like Cymoxanil, Metalaxyl, Mancozeb, and Fosetyl-Al. Each has its own strengths and limitations, suitable for different crops, disease types, weather conditions, and usage timings. This article will help you understand their differences and how to choose the right one for your crop cycle.

Cymoxanil is an important active ingredient in the field of crop protection, particularly effective in preventing and treating fungal diseases. With its unique mode of action, Cymoxanil is widely used in various fungicides for crops. Let’s explore the details of Cymoxanil in the following article.

Within the Triazole group of fungicides (DMIs – Demethylation Inhibitors), the three most widely used actives today are Difenoconazole, Propiconazole, and Tebuconazole. While they share a common mode of action—inhibiting ergosterol biosynthesis, essential for fungal cell membranes—their systemic properties, disease control spectrum, and real-world effectiveness differ considerably.

So, which one is stronger and more suitable for farmers? Let’s take a detailed look.

Difenoconazole is one of the most popular and effective broad-spectrum fungicides in the Triazole (DMI) group. However, many farmers still wonder: Does Difenoconazole “burn” plants? Does it cause leaf yellowing or fruit drop? Is it safe for leafy vegetables and fruit trees? This article aims to clarify these concerns and guide you on its proper use.

In the movement toward sustainable agriculture, reducing chemical residues and protecting the environment, biological fungicides are gaining popularity among farmers. However, biological products often act slowly or insufficiently when used alone—especially during rapid disease development. So, can Difenoconazole, a potent chemical fungicide, be combined with biologicals to achieve dual effectiveness? The answer lies in the details below.